Skip to Content
Main content

CORDELLO AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

54

32%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

55

35%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

48

34%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

54

22%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

54

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

28

90%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

25

74%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

85
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

49

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

68

50%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

48

48%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

27

24%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

95

34%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

52

32%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

104

33%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

125
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.