CHARLES A MULLIGAN ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

430

54%

LEVEL 2

196

25%

LEVEL 3

108

14%

LEVEL 4

61

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

222

39%

LEVEL 2

177

31%

LEVEL 3

106

18%

LEVEL 4

69

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

182

49%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

108

39%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

248

58%

LEVEL 2

81

19%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

114

39%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

80

55%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

38

46%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

311

56%

LEVEL 2

133

24%

LEVEL 3

77

14%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

145
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

174

38%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

89

19%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

339

49%

LEVEL 2

194

28%

LEVEL 3

106

15%

LEVEL 4

59

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

173

33%

LEVEL 2

174

33%

LEVEL 3

106

20%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

91

94%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

49

94%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

162
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

257

43%

LEVEL 2

175

29%

LEVEL 3

101

17%

LEVEL 4

61

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

155
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

112

30%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

173

86%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

115

58%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

61

42%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

369

57%

LEVEL 2

163

25%

LEVEL 3

74

11%

LEVEL 4

44

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

134

39%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

421

54%

LEVEL 2

185

24%

LEVEL 3

106

14%

LEVEL 4

61

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

218

39%

LEVEL 2

171

30%

LEVEL 3

105

19%

LEVEL 4

69

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.