NORTHEAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

141

47%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

127

35%

LEVEL 2

139

38%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

63

50%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

73

44%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

78

44%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

131

47%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

117

35%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

126

45%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

110

33%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

87

42%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

104

69%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

90

58%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

137

48%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

124

36%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

138

46%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

123

35%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.