SIGNAL HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

85

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

88

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

44

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

39

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

41

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

42

35%

LEVEL 4

49

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

27

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

32

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

51

37%

LEVEL 4

47

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

50

40%

LEVEL 4

44

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

76

35%

LEVEL 4

83

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

83

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

85

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

167
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

88

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

77

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

75

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

14

26%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.