Skip to Content
Main content

PAUMANOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

61

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

82

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

30

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

40

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

31

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

37

38%

LEVEL 4

42

43%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

10

53%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

24

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

27

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

31

39%

LEVEL 4

20

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

33

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

12

40%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

8

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

66

38%

LEVEL 4

54

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

77

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

60

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

81

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

52

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

72

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.