BELLPORT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

186

61%

LEVEL 2

63

21%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

159

49%

LEVEL 2

79

24%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

80

57%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

70

51%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

106

65%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

89

48%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

48

80%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

36

73%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

98

74%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

86

60%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

154

59%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

111

42%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

32

80%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

48

81%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

54
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

145

56%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

122

44%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

41

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

37

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

36

34%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

150

76%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

125

61%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

172

60%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

153

48%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

14

88%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.