Skip to Content
Main content

MT SINAI UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

91

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

128

33%

LEVEL 4

91

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

40

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

51

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

18

37%

LEVEL 4

25

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

19

38%

LEVEL 4

22

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

89

28%

LEVEL 3

114

36%

LEVEL 4

90

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

89

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

17

46%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

20

45%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

128

33%

LEVEL 4

91

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

110

35%

LEVEL 4

84

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.