Skip to Content
Main content

THREE VILLAGE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

613
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 820

LEVEL 1

49

6%

LEVEL 2

158

19%

LEVEL 3

274

33%

LEVEL 4

339

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

659
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 850

LEVEL 1

47

6%

LEVEL 2

144

17%

LEVEL 3

301

35%

LEVEL 4

358

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

302
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

80

20%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

173

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

335
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

70

16%

LEVEL 3

155

36%

LEVEL 4

180

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

311
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

78

19%

LEVEL 3

145

35%

LEVEL 4

166

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

324
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

74

18%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

178

42%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

12

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

18

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

175
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

119

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

179
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

124

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

381
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

108

21%

LEVEL 3

188

36%

LEVEL 4

193

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

404
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

95

18%

LEVEL 3

202

39%

LEVEL 4

202

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

584
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 757

LEVEL 1

28

4%

LEVEL 2

145

19%

LEVEL 3

254

34%

LEVEL 4

330

44%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

631
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 779

LEVEL 1

24

3%

LEVEL 2

124

16%

LEVEL 3

286

37%

LEVEL 4

345

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

605
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 808

LEVEL 1

49

6%

LEVEL 2

154

19%

LEVEL 3

270

33%

LEVEL 4

335

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

649
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 835

LEVEL 1

44

5%

LEVEL 2

142

17%

LEVEL 3

295

35%

LEVEL 4

354

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

577
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 760

LEVEL 1

38

5%

LEVEL 2

145

19%

LEVEL 3

251

33%

LEVEL 4

326

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

601
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 764

LEVEL 1

34

4%

LEVEL 2

129

17%

LEVEL 3

268

35%

LEVEL 4

333

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

25

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.