Skip to Content
Main content

HORNELL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

121

35%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

123

39%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

59

38%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

62

35%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

106

34%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

99

37%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

86

31%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

43

88%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

37

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

105
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

123

40%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

33

25%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

86

43%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

90

49%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

117

35%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.