CAMPBELL-SAVONA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

79

24%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

46

26%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

86

25%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

32

62%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

26

60%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

61

29%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

139
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

77

24%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.