Skip to Content
Main content

ADDISON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

155

36%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

100

23%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

149

33%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

119

27%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

65

30%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

90

42%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

147

36%

LEVEL 2

128

31%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

144

33%

LEVEL 2

139

32%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

99

26%

LEVEL 2

133

35%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

48

83%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

50

81%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

110

44%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

102

40%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

140
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

153

36%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

155
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

149

34%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.