WATKINS GLEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

142

33%

LEVEL 2

139

32%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

63

32%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

62

31%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

73

31%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

10

50%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

132

34%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

125

32%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

82

23%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

60

77%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

54

77%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

90

38%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

91

37%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.