Skip to Content
Main content

MONT PLEASANT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

385

77%

LEVEL 2

82

16%

LEVEL 3

25

5%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

438

76%

LEVEL 2

102

18%

LEVEL 3

33

6%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

176

80%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

198

76%

LEVEL 2

49

19%

LEVEL 3

13

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

209

75%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

240

76%

LEVEL 2

53

17%

LEVEL 3

20

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

55

65%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

63

59%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

66

68%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

69

70%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

163

85%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

187

83%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

89

80%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

102

82%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

289

72%

LEVEL 2

78

20%

LEVEL 3

25

6%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

322

71%

LEVEL 2

97

21%

LEVEL 3

33

7%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

96

96%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

116

96%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

31
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

348

76%

LEVEL 2

79

17%

LEVEL 3

24

5%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

409

75%

LEVEL 2

99

18%

LEVEL 3

33

6%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

37

90%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

29

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

139

74%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

347

80%

LEVEL 2

66

15%

LEVEL 3

18

4%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

299

77%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

22

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

361

76%

LEVEL 2

80

17%

LEVEL 3

25

5%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

412

76%

LEVEL 2

97

18%

LEVEL 3

33

6%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

24

92%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

26

84%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.