VAN ANTWERP MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

118

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

119

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

53

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

51

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

65

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

68

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

27

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

22

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

83

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

118

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

117

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

22

56%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

217
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

118

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

113

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

224
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

112

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

18

31%

LEVEL 2

27

47%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.