Skip to Content
Main content

IROQUOIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

96

22%

LEVEL 3

135

31%

LEVEL 4

138

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

142

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

64

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

47

23%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

74

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

8

47%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

36

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

31

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

91

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

73

25%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

98

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

87

22%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

135

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

125

34%

LEVEL 4

138

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

25

54%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

84

22%

LEVEL 3

123

32%

LEVEL 4

129

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

133

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

23

36%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.