MECHANICVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

140

27%

LEVEL 2

146

28%

LEVEL 3

151

29%

LEVEL 4

77

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

119

23%

LEVEL 2

130

25%

LEVEL 3

141

28%

LEVEL 4

120

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

79

28%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

212
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

125

26%

LEVEL 2

137

29%

LEVEL 3

143

30%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

110

24%

LEVEL 2

112

24%

LEVEL 3

128

28%

LEVEL 4

110

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

149

34%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

107

25%

LEVEL 3

136

32%

LEVEL 4

120

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

56

72%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

55

66%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

96

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

72

40%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

63

33%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

257
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

119

24%

LEVEL 2

129

26%

LEVEL 3

140

28%

LEVEL 4

117

23%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

226
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

138

27%

LEVEL 2

145

28%

LEVEL 3

150

29%

LEVEL 4

76

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.