KODA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

400
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

50

9%

LEVEL 2

94

17%

LEVEL 3

195

36%

LEVEL 4

205

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

59

12%

LEVEL 2

98

19%

LEVEL 3

149

29%

LEVEL 4

205

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

188
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

91

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

92

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

212
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

53

18%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

114

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

194
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

113

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

8

67%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

46

63%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

57
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

46

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

300
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

79

19%

LEVEL 3

156

38%

LEVEL 4

144

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

260
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

69

19%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

141

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

81

16%

LEVEL 3

186

38%

LEVEL 4

200

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

78

17%

LEVEL 3

140

31%

LEVEL 4

203

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

24

47%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

397
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

90

17%

LEVEL 3

192

36%

LEVEL 4

205

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

348
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

93

19%

LEVEL 3

145

29%

LEVEL 4

203

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

345
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

74

17%

LEVEL 3

167

37%

LEVEL 4

178

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

69

17%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

178

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

27

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

26

23%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.