Skip to Content
Main content

NORWOOD-NORFOLK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

189

44%

LEVEL 2

139

32%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

154

38%

LEVEL 2

149

37%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

90

40%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

80

39%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

99

47%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

74

36%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

181

43%

LEVEL 2

135

32%

LEVEL 3

70

17%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

148

37%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

116

33%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

92

28%

LEVEL 2

135

41%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

73

84%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

62

78%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

155

56%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

123

47%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

105
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

187

44%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

104
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

148

38%

LEVEL 2

142

36%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.