MADRID-WADDINGTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

86

33%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

32

24%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

54

43%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

41

31%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

80

32%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

25

89%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

24

80%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

51

41%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

83

33%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

87
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

82

32%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.