BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

95

24%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

117

27%

LEVEL 2

113

26%

LEVEL 3

123

29%

LEVEL 4

74

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

111

27%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

71

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

100

28%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

37

71%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

51

75%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

55

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

89

34%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

195
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

116

27%

LEVEL 2

111

26%

LEVEL 3

121

29%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

170
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

84

23%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

193
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

113

27%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.