Skip to Content
Main content

POMONA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

258

63%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

44

11%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

319

65%

LEVEL 2

103

21%

LEVEL 3

48

10%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

127

60%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

154

64%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

131

65%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

165

67%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

75

61%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

79

62%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

176

66%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

229

68%

LEVEL 2

60

18%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

180

55%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

235

61%

LEVEL 2

90

23%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

78

91%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

84

82%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

134

51%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

158

51%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

124

83%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

161

89%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

40

74%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

243

62%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

279

64%

LEVEL 2

95

22%

LEVEL 3

44

10%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

48
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

231

62%

LEVEL 2

95

25%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

285

64%

LEVEL 2

94

21%

LEVEL 3

46

10%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

27

71%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

34

74%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.