LIME KILN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

265

58%

LEVEL 2

117

26%

LEVEL 3

49

11%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

249

53%

LEVEL 2

120

25%

LEVEL 3

76

16%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

136

58%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

129

55%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

129

58%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

120

51%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

60

55%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

53

50%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

192

61%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

187

55%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

45

13%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

156

49%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

181

48%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

109

81%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

68

76%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

97

39%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

91

34%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

168

82%

LEVEL 2

31

15%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

158

76%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

251

59%

LEVEL 2

112

26%

LEVEL 3

45

11%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

226

53%

LEVEL 2

113

26%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

252

58%

LEVEL 2

114

26%

LEVEL 3

49

11%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

101
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

232

52%

LEVEL 2

116

26%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.