Skip to Content
Main content

HEMPSTEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

139

52%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

123

48%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

81

59%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

59

44%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

58

45%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

64

52%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

45

48%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

40

45%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

83

55%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

76

52%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

110

48%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

94

42%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

29

74%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

29

83%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

58

37%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

81

72%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

72

76%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

13

46%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

126

53%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

110

49%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

128

51%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

109

46%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.