Skip to Content
Main content

NYACK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

84

23%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

83

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

15

45%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

55

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

52

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

30

44%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

35

44%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

30

30%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

76

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

78

24%

LEVEL 3

124

38%

LEVEL 4

82

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

35

71%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

32

78%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

179
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

77

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

207
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

56

16%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

124

36%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

23

92%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

15

68%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

70

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

92

39%

LEVEL 4

72

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

64

52%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.