SCHODACK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

71

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

62

38%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

108

36%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

90

26%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

86

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

111

38%

LEVEL 4

70

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

87

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

28

64%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

27

47%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

98

38%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

111

39%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

184
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

70

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.