HOOSICK FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

142

33%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

144

33%

LEVEL 3

124

29%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

70

33%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

129

32%

LEVEL 2

135

33%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

174
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

100

25%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

100

27%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

80

21%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

42

74%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

27

57%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

91

44%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

78

34%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

136

32%

LEVEL 2

139

33%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

182
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

106

25%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

123

29%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.