Skip to Content
Main content

GEORGE FISCHER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

180

27%

LEVEL 2

198

30%

LEVEL 3

184

28%

LEVEL 4

103

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

190

28%

LEVEL 2

208

31%

LEVEL 3

177

26%

LEVEL 4

96

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

112

31%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

108

29%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

12

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

80

20%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

120

30%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

71

19%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

81

43%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

100

43%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

122

21%

LEVEL 2

188

32%

LEVEL 3

180

31%

LEVEL 4

99

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

137

23%

LEVEL 2

189

32%

LEVEL 3

171

29%

LEVEL 4

94

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

58

76%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

53

66%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

287
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

163

25%

LEVEL 2

193

30%

LEVEL 3

184

29%

LEVEL 4

103

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

273
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

163

26%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

177

28%

LEVEL 4

96

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

27

79%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

86

20%

LEVEL 2

138

31%

LEVEL 3

139

32%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

98

23%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

94

42%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

92

39%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

287
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

177

27%

LEVEL 2

196

30%

LEVEL 3

184

28%

LEVEL 4

103

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

272
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

189

28%

LEVEL 2

205

31%

LEVEL 3

176

26%

LEVEL 4

96

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.