SANDY CREEK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

89

27%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

45

26%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

84

27%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

31

78%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

32

86%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

69

36%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

67

35%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

129
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

136
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.