MEXICO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

146

27%

LEVEL 2

169

31%

LEVEL 3

141

26%

LEVEL 4

82

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

179

30%

LEVEL 2

180

30%

LEVEL 3

160

27%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

64

26%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

80

30%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

141

27%

LEVEL 2

162

31%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

167

30%

LEVEL 2

168

30%

LEVEL 3

156

28%

LEVEL 4

73

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

134

30%

LEVEL 4

81

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

112

23%

LEVEL 2

150

31%

LEVEL 3

151

31%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

60

63%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

67

63%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

68

31%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

108

34%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

134

37%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

215
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

140

27%

LEVEL 2

165

32%

LEVEL 3

134

26%

LEVEL 4

81

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

235
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

170

29%

LEVEL 2

177

30%

LEVEL 3

159

27%

LEVEL 4

76

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.