SOUTH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

341

65%

LEVEL 2

119

23%

LEVEL 3

57

11%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

401

61%

LEVEL 2

154

23%

LEVEL 3

76

12%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

158

67%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

182

60%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

183

63%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

219

61%

LEVEL 2

76

21%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

27

36%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

80

75%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

99

79%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

217

70%

LEVEL 2

62

20%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

247

66%

LEVEL 2

86

23%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

265

60%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

57

13%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

307

55%

LEVEL 2

151

27%

LEVEL 3

76

14%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

76

95%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

94

97%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

64
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

205

55%

LEVEL 2

105

28%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

100
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

254

53%

LEVEL 2

129

27%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

136

90%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

147

84%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

88

50%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

82

43%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

253

72%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

319

68%

LEVEL 2

100

21%

LEVEL 3

39

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

304

63%

LEVEL 2

112

23%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

101
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

363

59%

LEVEL 2

149

24%

LEVEL 3

74

12%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

37

80%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

38

84%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.