Skip to Content
Main content

PINE TREE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

78

17%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

150

32%

LEVEL 4

119

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

84

16%

LEVEL 2

116

22%

LEVEL 3

156

30%

LEVEL 4

164

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

74

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

62

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

90

34%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

22

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

27

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

68

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

41

17%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

95

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

108

27%

LEVEL 3

139

35%

LEVEL 4

116

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

94

21%

LEVEL 3

148

33%

LEVEL 4

162

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

42

62%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

46

59%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

265
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

118

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

319
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

75

15%

LEVEL 2

113

22%

LEVEL 3

155

31%

LEVEL 4

164

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

106

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

76

19%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

142

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

31

26%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.