Skip to Content
Main content

MAPLE HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

125

27%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

88

20%

LEVEL 2

155

35%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

38

36%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

28

26%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

93

34%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

122
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

86

34%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

93

23%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

133

33%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

32

57%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

24

44%

LEVEL 2

26

48%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

99

25%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

191
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

87

21%

LEVEL 2

140

33%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

62

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

26

43%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

30

38%

LEVEL 4

17

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

31

41%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

115

30%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

192
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

112

26%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

135

31%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

198
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

82

19%

LEVEL 2

144

34%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.