Skip to Content
Main content

C J HOOKER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

117

26%

LEVEL 2

162

35%

LEVEL 3

123

27%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

113

25%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

138

30%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

94

24%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

38

33%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

150

39%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

74

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

51

74%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

56

73%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

112

25%

LEVEL 2

159

36%

LEVEL 3

121

27%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

101

23%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

137

31%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

52

35%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

52

35%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.