Skip to Content
Main content

CRISPELL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

119

36%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

123

34%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

76

41%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

87

35%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

80

31%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

23

49%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

32

59%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

73

26%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

46

85%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

40

82%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

105
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

79

37%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

59

46%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

78

54%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.