WASHINGTONVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

165

34%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

108

22%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

143

28%

LEVEL 2

172

34%

LEVEL 3

168

33%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

85

35%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

80

33%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

100

35%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

10

77%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

105

38%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

26

42%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

53

36%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

118

28%

LEVEL 2

167

39%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

163

37%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

47

80%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

53

77%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

160

34%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

107

23%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

196
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

136

27%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

166

33%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

116

31%

LEVEL 3

139

37%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

61

47%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

54

38%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

137
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

162

34%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.