Skip to Content
Main content

HURLBUT W SMITH K-8 SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

302

56%

LEVEL 2

140

26%

LEVEL 3

75

14%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

358

63%

LEVEL 2

124

22%

LEVEL 3

66

12%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

143

52%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

168

60%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

159

59%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

190

66%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

50

52%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

51

59%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

203

58%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

242

66%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

32

76%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

215

49%

LEVEL 2

128

29%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

255

57%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

63

14%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

87

85%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

103

89%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

214

50%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

264

58%

LEVEL 2

111

24%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

88

76%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

94

84%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

36

40%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

67

58%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

266

59%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

54

12%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

291

64%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

44

10%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

100
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

285

55%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

75

14%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

331

62%

LEVEL 2

121

23%

LEVEL 3

66

12%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

27

90%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.