MARCELLUS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

381
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

67

11%

LEVEL 2

156

26%

LEVEL 3

223

37%

LEVEL 4

158

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

202

35%

LEVEL 4

161

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

109

41%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

74

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

200
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

86

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

188
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

87

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

362
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

151

26%

LEVEL 3

213

37%

LEVEL 4

149

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

346
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

136

25%

LEVEL 3

195

36%

LEVEL 4

151

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

373
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

137

25%

LEVEL 3

216

40%

LEVEL 4

157

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

128

25%

LEVEL 3

196

38%

LEVEL 4

158

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

36

57%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

33

55%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

379
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

155

26%

LEVEL 3

221

37%

LEVEL 4

158

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

309
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

107

24%

LEVEL 3

176

39%

LEVEL 4

133

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

114

26%

LEVEL 3

157

35%

LEVEL 4

140

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

45

36%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

357
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

143

25%

LEVEL 3

197

35%

LEVEL 4

160

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.