Skip to Content
Main content

C S DRIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

49

10%

LEVEL 2

136

28%

LEVEL 3

171

35%

LEVEL 4

131

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

61

13%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

163

34%

LEVEL 4

125

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

55

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

75

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

290
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

132

28%

LEVEL 3

164

35%

LEVEL 4

126

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

274
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

157

35%

LEVEL 4

117

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

164

37%

LEVEL 4

130

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

115

27%

LEVEL 3

160

37%

LEVEL 4

123

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

24

52%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

31

65%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

300
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

135

28%

LEVEL 3

169

35%

LEVEL 4

131

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

133

36%

LEVEL 4

112

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

135

35%

LEVEL 4

112

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

285
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

61

13%

LEVEL 2

125

27%

LEVEL 3

160

34%

LEVEL 4

125

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.