Skip to Content
Main content

SOLVAY UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

176

43%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

181

44%

LEVEL 2

115

28%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

84

44%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

92

42%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

90

43%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

110

38%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

29

71%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

127

36%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

138

39%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

49

83%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

43

78%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

159

42%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

170

43%

LEVEL 2

107

27%

LEVEL 3

71

18%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

35

31%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

154

51%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

146

49%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

117
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

176

43%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.