Skip to Content
Main content

CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

73

17%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

120

28%

LEVEL 4

123

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

108

26%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

116

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

64

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

55

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

59

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

61

29%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

114

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

65

17%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

110

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

122

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

116

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

41

72%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

231
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

106

26%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

114

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

67

22%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

108

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

97

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

43

35%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

230
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

108

26%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

113

28%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

242
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

123

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.