Skip to Content
Main content

SEVENTY NINTH STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

85

37%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

59

27%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

46

42%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

31

28%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

28

26%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

66

34%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

19

61%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

66

41%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

81

37%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.