Skip to Content
Main content

NEWFANE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

114

29%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

120

29%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

86

24%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

111

29%

LEVEL 2

106

28%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

41

65%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

55

80%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

73

35%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

174
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

88

23%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.