Skip to Content
Main content

EMMET BELKNAP INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

159

34%

LEVEL 2

122

26%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

186

36%

LEVEL 2

121

23%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

73

32%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

100

38%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

90

28%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

17

45%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

35

64%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

29

59%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

30

52%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

127

30%

LEVEL 2

115

28%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

122

28%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

80

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

32

70%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

64

79%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

178

35%

LEVEL 2

120

23%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

80

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

113

43%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

138

44%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

214
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

184

36%

LEVEL 2

119

23%

LEVEL 3

134

26%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

180
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

153

34%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

215
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

179

35%

LEVEL 2

118

23%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

80

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.