Skip to Content
Main content

PS 17 HENRY DAVID THOREAU GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

90

40%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

84

35%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

35

31%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

53

43%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

49

38%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

15

39%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

14

45%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

22

69%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

55

43%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

54

40%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

36

71%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

46

74%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

29

60%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

28

61%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

15

30%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

75

43%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

72

40%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

77

37%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

73

33%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.