Skip to Content
Main content

PS 112 DUTCH KILLS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

61

29%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

33

31%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

23

25%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

27

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

25

43%

LEVEL 4

21

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

27

50%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

18

39%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

22

27%

LEVEL 2

32

40%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

34

45%

LEVEL 3

18

24%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

37

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

10

50%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

81
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.