ALBERT SHANKER SCH-VISUAL/PERF ARTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

248

39%

LEVEL 2

151

24%

LEVEL 3

98

15%

LEVEL 4

144

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

248

37%

LEVEL 2

153

23%

LEVEL 3

95

14%

LEVEL 4

166

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

107

38%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

69

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

108

34%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

89

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

141

39%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

75

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

140

41%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

131
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

93

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

144
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

107

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

20

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

70

64%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

68

66%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

132

45%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

144

48%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

142

28%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

92

18%

LEVEL 4

143

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

155

28%

LEVEL 2

140

25%

LEVEL 3

91

16%

LEVEL 4

166

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

106

82%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

93

85%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

239
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

204

35%

LEVEL 2

146

25%

LEVEL 3

96

16%

LEVEL 4

143

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

257
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

207

34%

LEVEL 2

147

24%

LEVEL 3

91

15%

LEVEL 4

166

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

44

85%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

41

80%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

37

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

52

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

234

42%

LEVEL 2

140

25%

LEVEL 3

77

14%

LEVEL 4

107

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

235

42%

LEVEL 2

139

25%

LEVEL 3

74

13%

LEVEL 4

114

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

237
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

231

38%

LEVEL 2

145

24%

LEVEL 3

96

16%

LEVEL 4

141

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

251
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

229

37%

LEVEL 2

144

23%

LEVEL 3

90

14%

LEVEL 4

161

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

19

50%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.