Skip to Content
Main content

PS 2 ALFRED ZIMBERG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

128

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

128

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

63

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

61

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

65

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

67

46%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

29

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

30

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

60

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

67

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

37

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

29

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

122

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

124

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

14

27%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

180
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

123

49%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

120

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

42

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

44

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

86

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

84

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

195
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

126

43%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

201
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

125

46%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.