Skip to Content
Main content

PS 136 ROY WILKINS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

93

35%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

49

36%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

63

45%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

44

34%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

89

39%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

75
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

46

82%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

34

64%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

100

39%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

26

42%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

21

26%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

17

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

87

40%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

101

40%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.