PS 182 SAMANTHA SMITH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

174

45%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

141

38%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

77

42%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

93

49%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

26

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

26

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

20

49%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

129

57%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

98

46%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

124

38%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

93

31%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

50

77%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

48

68%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

96
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

92

35%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

105
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

82

63%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

76

66%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

168

44%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

137

38%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

148

43%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

105
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

118

36%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

26

59%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.