PS 86 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

136

27%

LEVEL 2

117

23%

LEVEL 3

153

30%

LEVEL 4

105

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

97

22%

LEVEL 2

110

24%

LEVEL 3

123

27%

LEVEL 4

121

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

54

20%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

51

21%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

68

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

164
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

85

34%

LEVEL 4

79

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

162
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

88

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

19

46%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

70

40%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

53

35%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

85

20%

LEVEL 2

99

23%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

100

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

64

17%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

109

29%

LEVEL 4

112

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

51

57%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

33

44%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

221
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

68

19%

LEVEL 2

77

21%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

98

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

218
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

71

21%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

115

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

68

47%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

50

43%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

26

26%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

25

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

30

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

110

27%

LEVEL 2

100

24%

LEVEL 3

121

29%

LEVEL 4

80

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

86

23%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

91

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

241
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

105

23%

LEVEL 3

142

31%

LEVEL 4

99

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

226
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

81

20%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

115

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

29

50%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.